RSS Feed

Category Archives: Look Back On

Look Back On: WORLD WAR ONE

FIRST-WORLD-WAR

I used to know the ins and outs of the first world war, because Mrs Sullivan, my school history teacher told me all about it and had me write an essay about it. Now, while I still can associate stuff like Gallipoli and the Western Front and the trenches with WW1, I have forgotten all the important details, which makes me a bit of a wally during the minutes of silence we do at ANZAC day services because I’m picturing the fallen soldiers in Hollywood movie sets rather than my solid fact filled visions; I’m reflecting feebly on things I don’t know enough about.  I only have a couple of days to get my minute’s silence sorted and I can at least cover the main bits and the Australian involvement in the first world war in that time (which is fitting given that ANZAC day originally commemorated the battle at Gallipoli during WW1) but only if I’m QUICK. Here goes…

When was it (I need dates)?

The first world war (world war one, the great war, the war to end all wars, the war of the nations) raged from July 1914 to November 1918. There was a temporary truce called over the Christmas of 1914, when opposing sides ceased fire, sang carols and exchanged gifts.

What lead to the declaration of war?

Well in simple terms, the Superpowers of Europe were getting a bit big for their boots, enjoying a resurgence of imperialism – controlling countries politically from afar as per the days of colonialism. European power bearers were introducing imperialism into their foreign policy to increase trade, capital and industrial potential. As a result there were some grumpy little Davids (particularly in the Balkan states) aiming their rocks at Goliath’s balls, but more significantly, there were other already established Goliaths getting unsettled:

France and Britain aligned themselves as the “Entente Cordiale” to slow the growth of the newly unified German Empire with its grandiose designs on trade and expanding military force. This was a reluctant alliance given a long culture of hostility between France and Britain, but it was practical as many of their colonial holdings were geographically close. France was already aligned with Russia. These alliances were tested and tensions stretched in 1905 when Germany tried to take Morocco (the Moroccan Crisis) in a bid to break the alliance and provoke a crisis.

I’m thinking that Kaiser Wilhelm 2 was partly to blame for the tensions in the lead up to war – the Moroccan Crisis was his doing. He appeared to have been pointlessly power hungry, keen to play dangerous games of one-upmanship and judging by the way he expanded his naval force, probably had a very small penis.

What was the ultimate trigger (pardon the pun)?

So in June 1914, Austrian Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his wife Sophie were assassinated in Sarajevo, the capital of Austrian-Hungarian province Bosnia-Herzegovina. They were shot by a member of The Black Hand, a secret society fighting for Serbian Nationalism after the annexing of Bosnia-Herzegovina by Austria (imperialism at work). The Black Hand had 7 (some say more) assassins assigned to the task that day.

I felt very sad when I read about this event; when the pregnant Sophie was shot she fell onto her husband’s knees and he (mortally wounded himself) said, “Sophie dear, don’t die, stay alive for our children.” And (because I’m on a tangent now) the 3 children were raised by relatives and loved long lives – anyway why I’m getting hung up on one tragedy when I’m about to delve into about 9 million of them I don’t know.

One month after the assassinations, Austria declared war on Bosnia. Russia, defending Serbian independence, mobilized its forces and refused to respond to German demands to demobilize. On the 1st of August, Germany declared war on Russia and then things got very globally chaotic.

I think I need a timeline

Ok…1914 chaos broken down:

  • June 28 – Sarajevo assassination of Austrian Archduke at the hands of Serbia.
  • July 28 – Serbia refuses to agree to 1 of 15 terms of an Austrian imposed ultimatum, so Austria declares war on Serbia.
  • August 1 – Germany declares war on Russia after Russia refuses to stop getting all bristly over the threat to Serbian nationalism.
  • August 3 – Germany declares war on the Russian-allied France.
  • August 4 – Grumpy Germany invades little weenie Luxembourg and then neutral Belgium. Britain says ‘fair play old boy’ and declares war on Germany. Australia follows the mother country and declares war on Germany, so does Canada and New Zealand.
  • August 23 – Japan declares war on both Austria-Hungary and Germany. The two became known as the Central Powers.
  • September – A unity pact is signed by France, Britain and Russia. They became known as the Allied Forces.

These were alliances formed decades before, now formalised at war. Via their colonies, the battle for the balance of power was to spread  throughout the world and involve more than half the globe.

It is interesting to note that some scholars see WW1 as the first phase of a 30 year long conflict that ended with WW2 in 1945.

What’s the Western/Eastern front business?

Germany intended to storm easily through Belgium to deal a knockout blow to the French before facing the more slow to warm up Russia. But they faces unexpected resistance in Belgium even before Britain jumped  in to defend the neutral country. Russia mobilized surprisingly quickly and attacked Germany in East Prussia, forcing some German troops to be diverted. This allowed Britain and France to halt Germany’s advance on Paris in the Battle of the Marne. With this battle, the fighting became entrenched here in central France and became known as the Western Front. The attacks on Germany and Austria became the Eastern Front.

Two split the fighting into two fronts was never part of Germany’s plan.

How did Turkey get involved?

Late in 1914, the wily Germans tricked the Ottoman Empire (Turkey) into thinking that Russia had attacked them. The result was Turkey joining the Central Powers and fought for the Russian territories as well as the Suez canal – the crucial communication line between Britain and India. This meant that in 1915 Britain sent troops to a new front in the South at Gallipoli and Mesopotamia.

What happened in Gallipoli? 

The allies had already launched a failed attack on Turkey in the Dardanelles. Their next effort was to take Constantinople (capital of Turkey) via the Gallipoli Peninsula. The fighting began in April 1915 when Australian and New Zealand troops arrived at the beaches of the Gallipoli Peninsula by boat and ended in stalemate that December when the allies evacuated. Around 180,000 allied troops were killed, 8,141 of them Australian. It was here that New Zealand and Aussie troops fought side by side in the trenches and the ANZACS were born. Lone Pine is a well known part of the Battle of Gallipoli. But it was a pointless campaign that left us with 8,141 less Aussies, some oaty biscuits and a public holiday every April 25th (the day the Gallipoli campaign began) so that we can stop and remember those who never came home.

In the trenches at Gallipoli

In the trenches at Gallipoli

But perhaps it wasn’t so pointless. The Turks claimed victory and huge triumph over the campaign and there is no doubt it was a tragically bad plan on the part of the Allies, but as the first major battle undertaken by Australia and New Zealand, it is considered by many to be the catalyst for national consciousness and mateship for both these countries. Of course we wish it had never happened but it would be nice to think that those young men gave their lives for something.

And here’s some stuff to help with the moment of silence visuals; picture this - Extracted from the diary of Australian Signaller Ellis Silas (who survived Gallipoli):

Pope’s Hill – daybreak – down in the Valley, in the midst of this frightful hell of screaming shrapnel and heavy ordinance, the birds are chirping in the clear morning air and buzzing about from leaf to leaf, placidly going about its work, is a large bee – to think of what might be makes me weep, for fighting is continuing in all its fury. Our signallers have been nearly all wiped out – I suppose I’ll get my lead pill next. It has now been a ceaseless cry of, ‘Stretcher bearers on the left’ – they seem to be having an awful time up there – one poor fellow has just jumped out of his dug-out frightfully wounded in the arm; I bound it as best I could, then had to dash off with another message. All along the route, scrambling along the side of the exposed incline, my comrades offered me a dug-out for me to take cover as the snipers are getting our chaps every minute, but as the messages are important I must take my chance. All along the route I keep coming across bodies of the poor chaps who have been less fortunate than I.

The complete diary is heartbreaking. The trenches were damp and rat infested and the decaying bodies of fallen men lay everywhere.  As Silas said, “the snipers are just the natural order of things…as much a part of the landscape as the clouds”. The youngest soldier to die at Gallipoli was just 14 years old. I feel the need to use an emoticon here but it seems direspectful; silly little things they are. Anyway, anyone who didn’t die suffered terribly from delirium and shell shock.

Australian Light Horsemen, 1914

Australian Light Horsemen, 1914

The backup of the cavalry (horse mounted soldiers) did little to advance things, the Australian Light Horses and NZ and Canadian Mounted Rifles were originally used for shock tactics and fast advance. But their weakness in the face of machine guns shone through in WW1, particularly in the more significant battles such as Gallipoli.

And here’s another picture I found by chance – a group of Tasmanian nurses who were recruited to work at the hospital at Lemnos, located 110 km from Gallipoli to take the casualties.

Tasmanian Nurses at Lemnos

Moving on from Gallipoli…

Oh yes, there was more to the war of course. Right. Well the trench warfare seen in Gallipoli became the norm for the battlegrounds of the middle part of the WW1 (1916-1917). On the Western Front alone there were about 15,000 km of trenches and 800,000 soldiers at any given time. Each battalion (of about 1100 men) held their section of the front for about a week before moving back to support lines, then reserve lines, then a week ‘out of line’ before returning to the front.

The Quagmires of Passchendaele

The Quagmires of Passchendaele

The Battle of the Somme was fought on the Western Front out of the trenches. As is usual for trench warfare, there was huge loss of life on both sides by no real progress for either. 20,000 British soldiers were killed on day 1 of the Battle of the Somme (1st July 1916). All up, the battle resulted in over 700,000 allied casualties and 650,000 German. The Battle of Passchendaele in Belgium on the Western Front was fought later that same month in unimaginable conditions, again with huge loss of life and little progress.   

When did things start to progress?

Well even the German’s use of poison gas against the Russians and liquid fire against the British, followed by the British introduction of tanks (I am somehow reminded of little boys with toys here) did relatively little to progress things other than waves of panic. It was when the battle took to the skies rather than under the ground that things finally started to move forward. In the Autumn of 1915 some pretty primitive forward firing planes were released by Germany, then in July 1917 they sent bombers over London as well as bomb laden zeppelins (big gas balloony things).

Zeppelin - clumsy looking thing

Zeppelin – clumsy looking thing

Then came the wrath of the German U-boats (derived from the word unterseebooten, which shouldn’t make me smile so much). These submarines were brought in against Allied merchant shipping in certain key waterways. But it was the sinking of the American passenger liner, The Lusitania on April 6th 1917 that really set things in motion.

Progress on the Eastern Front

Meanwhile, Germany was making inroads in the East as the Russians struggled to infiltrate East Prussia. In August 1915, Poland fell when the Germans captured Warsaw and later in December 1916, the Germans helped the Austrians take Bucharest (capital of Romania). Russia was further weakened by internal unrest, fueled by the Tsar’s indifference to action on the front and the general incompetence of imperial rule. Conservative noblemen murdered the notorious Rasputin – a favourite of the Tsar – and things in Russia got altogether hectic – ie the Russian Revolution of 1917, a Bolshevik uprising which is another story to delve into another day. The upshot was that Russia was forced to withdraw from the war.

Come on, wrap it up Meg. How did the war end?

Well on April 6, 1917, a fed up and pissed of United States declared war on Germany and sent a fleet of warships to join the British Navy. Later they sent troops in to assist the allies on the ground.

On March 21st 1918, Germany launched a major offensive against the allies, using new tactics involving stormtroopers to storm the trenches using creeping barrages (eek). This was do or die for the Germans. Troops on either side were exhausted and the impending arrival of fresh US troops on the allies’ side meant the Germans had to give it their all. They brought in new long range cannons and with them were able to shell Paris from 74 miles away. 250 unsuspecting Parisians died on 23rd March as a result. Even more significantly, as the Germans stormed the Somme the Allied front line was broken.

The Battle of Lys a couple of days later resulted in more casualties on both sides, further exhaustion and very low morale, particularly amongst the Germans. In May 1918 the US troops finally arrived and claimed vicort on the Western Front at Somme. From then on, the Allies were able to hold their lines, with help from counterattacks from ANZAC and Canadian forces when Germany launched offensives. By July, the allies were back on the offensive. Their attack at Amiens on August the 8th using tanks and causing mass German confusion was described by a German official as “the blackest day of the German army”. The US launched their own successful offensive while the Italian army launched attacks on the Austrio-Hungarian empire. Phew.

Meantime, Turkey was weakened by Arab revolts and large British offensives which claimed Baghdad and Mesopotamia. The Eastern front collapsed, the Western front was collapsing and Germany was surrounded.

armistice

Armistice Joy

229945_f260On October 3rd 1918, Germany requested a ceasefire. Turkey and Austria-Hungary had followed suit by November. Fighting ceased with an armistice signed by all parties on November the 11th and at 11 am that day, hostilities officially ended (aha - Remembrance Day).

What happened to Germany after the war? 

The Treaty of Versailles which was signed after long and convoluted diplomatic negotiations on June 28th, 1919 was a day of utter humiliation for the German Empire. The country was required by the terms of the treaty to accept territory losses including Poland and Alsace-Lorraine. THey were also obligated to pay impossibly huge war reparations (that subsequently took fifty or so years to fulfill) and to admit full responsibility for the entire war (which was actually not quite right and very difficult for the Germans to swallow). After previous European wars, both sides had accepted responsibility, dealt with their losses, shaken hands and moved on. In this case, Germany copped it and the results of this harsh treatment was a bitter, impoverished country that would teeter on the brink of violence for decades, leaving it wanting for change and open to the influence of Nazis. And we all know the consequences of that (shiver). An even nastier war.

A Few Final Facts

The first world war began with a cold blooded murder, some imperialist argy bargy, a puffed up kaiser who wanted more boats that the Royal British Navy and an eagerness, even excitement to test out new weaponry and associated technology. It ended with over 16 million military and civilian deaths and a further 20 million wounded, many of whom had no understanding of what it was they were fighting for or what they were innocently caught up in. Entire countries were in ruins and economies in shambles.

When we remember the fallen, with thanks and sadness, we must also give thanks for the relative peace most of us live with now and remember how important is it is avoid such conflict at all costs.

cemerety

So, I now have my minute’s silence all packaged up and ready to go just in the nick of time (missed the dawn service, going to one shortly, hence the slightly rushed ending bit and possible multiple typo’s – sorry). Actually I have enough imagery to fill many, many minutes of silence. Underscoring it will be the sense of how damn lucky I am not to have experienced anything like this in my lifetime, and the hope that one day people will just bloody well stop killing other people.

What do you see during the silence of ANZAC and Remembrance days?

Click here if you’d like to read up on the Vietnam War.

And here’s the poem I wrote on ANZAC day last year:

A Million Stories

Against the red of rising sun,

A million stories, more

Whisper to bring the years undone,

Call back a dreadful underscore.

`

Talk to me, I’m listening,

Bring anger, tears and shame,

Let your toils rise up and sing,

Cry pain and shout your names.

`

Today our peace is piercing, loud;

Our comforts now abrasive

As fury builds and sorrow shrouds

For what you had to give.

`

These memories don’t belong to me

Yet I will make them mine

You are those I’ll never see

Yet long will thanks enshrine.

red poppy

Look Back On: Drowning

I know it seems a morbid subject, but ever since I found myself sitting on Tasmania’s memorial to the drowned (Tamanian Sefarer’s Memorial in Triabunna on Tasmania’s East Coast) a few years ago, I have thought a lot about the poor souls who have succumbed to the trap of water. Somehow – especially given my home is by a river on the coast of an island off the south coast of the world’s biggest island (I know that from those Bacardi ads on the telly in the 90′s), it seems really dumb that we don’t have gills to save us, and here in Tassie, some seal-like skin.

Anyway, back to Triabunna, I was waiting impatiently for my family to buy sausage rolls at the bakery when I realised the low brick wall I was sitting on carried a heap of plaques and was shaped like a fish. I began to read. Here were the stories of those wrecked, swept away, drowned or missing in Tasmanian waters. I became lost in the frightening, cold world of those lost at sea. When I finished reading and returned to dry land, the sausage rolls were bought, eaten, my family were waiting for me and I felt all warm and grateful, sort of like when you’ve showered and dressed after a winter wet-suited water ski (from which my maturity [okay, age] these days prohibits). I wiped away tears but I remember the stories…of fishermen and sailors, travelers, naval crew dating right back to the early days of sailing when whole ships went down with all on board.

There is the story of the Hobart based yacht the Charleston that was lost in 1979 on her way to Sydney to begin the Sydney to Hobart yacht race. I was too young to remember the tragedy but remember some of those family members left behind. They are still wondering. No trace of the yacht of its crew have ever been found.

Of course I remember clearly the storm that claimed the lives of 6 yachtsman in the 1998 Sydney to Hobart. There is a plaque for them.

In 1959 a cargo ship called the Blythe Star sank off South West Cape. Despite a huge air search the vessel could not be located. 7 of her crew were found on the Tasman Peninsula (not far from where I sit now), 11 days after the vessel’s disappearance. 3 drowned. Here is the amazing story on the news at the time (was telly ever really this dodgy?)…

And in 1845, the Cataraqui, a British Baroque sailing ship sank in Bass Straight in 1845 en route to Victoria carrying 369 emigrants and 41 crew. It crashed into rocks just off King Island. With 400 lives lost it is Australia’s worst civil maritime disaster.

But Tasmanian waters aside, do you know that while our politicians have been friggin’ about over Asylum Seeker Policy for the last 4 years, nearly 1000 boat people have drowned? With today’s bill passed in the House of Reps just an hour or so ago, and the senate looking like it will give it the big nod, I really hope these unnecessary drownings will stop.

And putting political stuff aside now, in a few months it will also be 4 years since the drowning of our close family friend James Bennett. He was lost after being pulled into white water in a Queensland swimming hole. His larrikin, easy-going nature will be long remembered. James was a naval officer, a diver and a longtime water lover. If anyone could survive an incident in water he could; so clearly the forces he was up against were exceptionally strong. I like to think that – given his diving background – he felt no panic or pain, but rather felt at home under the water. I like to believe the rumours that drowning is a peaceful – even euphoric – way to die. Because you deserve that James, you really do. And you deserve one of those beautiful sirens – those ones who call sailors to their deaths with their song – to take you in and keep you loved for evermore. And I hope she has big boobies because I bet you were a boobs man. I know you won’t mind me saying that.

In fact, there is a Tim Buckley song I really love about sirens. Maybe I’ll sing it, for James and for all the people who have drowned or are missing at sea, everywhere, all over the world.

Hmm, maybe I’ll sing it, record it and post it here. Actually it was one of my blog goals when I started Megoracle to do a singing post, and I think I’ve been blogging for about a year. Let me check…yep, my first post was 15th of August last year, which makes TODAY Megoracle’s 1st birthday!! Oh so glad I checked. Right, no time like today for my first ever singing post. Hold on…

Rightio, I’ve done a hasty recording of Tim Buckley’s Song to the Siren – my very flawed version based on the one done by the Cocteau Twins. I would have planned and rehearsed more but I have to pick up the children and it’s not Megoracle’s birthday much longer, not that this is much of a birthday song, just the marking of a milestone – a goal post.

My web cam mic has given me an Ita lisp, plus I’ve only just started playing the guitar so don’t hold the lack of skills against me either, disclaimers over. Importantly it comes from my heart for all those drowned. PRESS HERE TO LISTEN.

Here are the lyrics given that the audio is so shite:

Long afloat on shipless oceans 
I did all my best to smile 
’til your singing eyes and fingers 
Drew me loving to your isle 
And you sang 
Sail to me 
Sail to me 
Let me enfold you 
Here I am 
Here I am 
Waiting to hold you 

Did I dream you dreamed about me? 
Were you hare when I was fox? 
Now my foolish boat is leaning 
Broken lovelorn on your rocks, 
For you sing, ‘touch me not, touch me not, come back tomorrow: 
O my heart, o my heart shies from the sorrow’ 

I am puzzled as the newborn 
I am troubled at the tide: 
Should I stand amid the breakers? 
Should I lie with death my bride? 
Hear me sing, ‘swim to me, swim to me, let me enfold you: 
Here I am, here I am, waiting to hold you.

James “Jimmy the Juicer” Bennett.

THE VIETNAM WAR – A Different Conclusion from a Brilliant Mind (and a bit of a tribute really)

Posted on

Denis Warner OBE, CMG

On Monday I went to the funeral of my great uncle, my grandfather’s brother and the last surviving Warner of his generation. His name was Denis Warner and he was something of a journalistic legend. He was awarded both an OBE and CMG (order of St Michael and St George) for his contribution to journalism. He lived and worked extensively throughout Asia and Australia, for many years as a war correspondent. His coverage included that of the allied push to recapture Asia-Pacific territory seized by Japan, the Cold War and the Vietnam War.

The Vietnam War (get your context here) was widely considered to be a meaningless war, a catastrophic defeat for US-led forces and a sleight against humanity. This perspective contributed to widespread emotional and psychological health problems among the veterans that served in and returned from Vietnam. But Denis Warner formed a different view and one I’d not heard before.

In his eulogy, delivered by his longtime colleague and friend Michael Richardson, it was noted that a retrospective article written by Denis on Vietnam was particularly remarkable. It was published in the International Herald Tribune and the New York Times in April 2000 to mark the 25th Anniversary of the fall of Saigon and stated that the Vietnam War had

“bought time for the non-communist countries of Southeast Asia to strengthen themselves, and concentrate on reform and economic development, so that by the time the Vietnamese Communists emerged victorious, the Southeast Asian ‘dominoes’ stood firm instead of falling, as the Hanoi propagandists predicted.

In the end, it was the communist-led states pf Indo-China (Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia)  that had to accept peaceful co-existence and later join the non-communist Association of the South East Asian nations (ASEAN). 

Denis highlighted in his article just how precarious hings were for these non-communist countries, namely Thailand, Malaysia and Singapore. They faced a likely communist alliance between Indonesia and China, a strength of which could well have dissolved any resistance. After reading the article, Singapore’s leader (and close friend of DW) Lee Kuan Yew wrote to Denis expressing his agreement:

“You put it well. I was, and still am, convinced that if LBJ (US President Johnson) had not got US forces to stay in Vietnam in 1965, but had bowed out, the will to resist in South East Asia would have melted. The Thais would have yielded to the seemingly inevitable, and Malaysia and Singapore would have been chewed up. Indonesia would have also been overtaken. What a joy and relief to have a living witness speak out the truth, although it is unpopular with the liberal media.” 

It’s an interesting perspective and one worth noting I think, however long ago it all happened. Well I think so anyway, maybe I’m just being overly proud of my great uncle.

On that note, and as an aside, Australians were highly regarded as war reporters, partly because they didn’t rely on military briefings but went to the front and lived with the fighters on the ground, and because, according to one correspondent, they were not afraid of camping. Denis Warner was one of these. As a man of integrity and good judgment he developed many contacts in high places over the years, many of whom trusted him with insights no working journalist would be privy to today. In light of recent events surrounding the Murdoch Press and phone hacking scandals (I am working on a post on this so watch this space), it is possible that the press will never again win the trust of any mover and shaker in the way of Denis and his contemporaries, and that a great percentage of what we read will be obtained by clandestine means with wobbly accuracy and questionable credibility. What a shame. Another reason to long for the Good Old Days.

Goodbye Denis Ashton Warner, you “giant of the best of journalism” and loving family man. And thank you.

Look Back On: The Independence of East Timor

Things about East Timor.  

Here it is!

Where is is again?

East Timor (640km Northwest of Darwin) is the first new nation of this century and the third millennium - gaining independence on 20th May 2002.

It is one of the only two Asian countries to be predominantly Roman Catholic (the other is the Philippines).

It’s real name is Timor-Leste. It is 15,400 km in size

It is an island in the Indonesian archipelago, which is made up of approximately 17,000 islands. 8874 of these islands have been named.

It became a Portuguese colony in the 16th century, while the rest of Indonesia was mostly colonised by the Dutch.

Why was there so much unrest over there?

Well the Portuguese colony was invaded and occupied by Indonesia in 1975. This action was supported by the US and its allies (Australia included) as it was alleged that the East Timorese FRETLIN party was communist and a communist domino effect was feared for Southeast Asia. The period of Indonesian rule until 1999 was marked by brutality and violence. It has been reported that up to 200,000 East Timorese died through famine, disease and fighting.

The Dili massacre of 1991 in which 400 students were killed was a turning point for the East Timorese, with the oppressive Indonesian (under President Suharto) regime receiving widespread international condemnation and shame on the part of the nations who had previously supported Indonesia.

How was is resolved?

The UN stepped in and sponsored an agreement between new Indonesian President BJ Habibe, Portugal and the US to hold a referendum in August 1999. The East Timorese voted overwhelmingly in favour of independence and in response, militia loyal to Indonesia went on a rampage of murder and destruction. An Australian lead peacekeeping force (INTERFET) intervened to restore order. The militia fled across the border but attempted sporadic raids across that border (which was held by the New Zealand Army). Gradually, with help from international moral opinion, the militia dispersed and Indonesia withdrew tacit support. INTERFET was replaced by a UN police force and a unit was formed to investigate atrocities. In 2002, a previously stubborn Portugal agreed to recognise East Timor’s independence.

What has happened since?  

The rebuilding of East Timor has been one of  the UN’s success stories. UN forces left in 2005. However, poverty and unemployment fueled riots and gang violence in 2006 and a new UN peacekeeping force (UNMIT) was set up. This force remained until March 2011, when operational control of the police force was handed over to East Timor authorities. Upwards of 1,200 UN police still patrol the streets but this is scheduled to end once the 2012 presidential elections are over.

Let’s hope things settle down to something near peace then. Gawd we’re lucky aren’t we?

 

 

Look Back On: GENOCIDE IN RWANDA

So I started thinking about revisiting the Rwandan genocide of 1994 (I wrote about it for the original (now old fashioned, newsletter style) Megoracle a few years ago), and then – as my life is a mosaic of synchronicity but that’s a weird story for another day – Rwanda popped up everywhere – on the telly, on the radio, on the internet (I stumbled across an organisation right here in Tassie called the “Rwandan Coffee Club“) and then this morning, there was talk about protests over the presence of Rwandan President Paul Kagame at the upcoming Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) in Perth. Why? I thought he was a goodie? So that’s my cue – Looking back on Rwanda.  Off we go…

In the space of 100 days – between April and June 1994 – an estimated 800,000 Rwandans were killed, for the most part in cold blood (incidentally, “in cold blood” is a phrase that indicates a lack of involvement or reason – detached behaviour, performed with cool deliberation).

The Shape of Rwanda, and the flag

Where the bloody hell’s Rwanda? The Republic of Rwanda is a country in central and Eastern Africa with a current population of 11.4 million.

Where did the trouble begin?  The genocide was the culmination of a long history of ethnic tension in the central African Republic of Rwanda. There are two main ethnic groups in Rwanda, the majority Hutus and and the minority Tutsis. 600 years ago the Tutsis moved south from Ethiopia and successfully invaded the Hutus in Rwanda. The two groups came to live harmoniously as one – inhabitating the same regions, speaking the same language and living the same traditions under a Tutsi king. Then the country was colonised by Belgium in 1916 and the Belgians considered the Tutsis the superior group (they looked more European). So the Tutsis enjoyed better education and employment that the Hutus. Resentment grew and by 1959 the Hutus began a series of violent riots in which up to 20,000 Tutsis were killed and many more fled to neighbouring Burundi, Tanzania and Uganda.

Why didn’t the Belgians just butt out? They did – eventually. In 1962, after pretty much starting the troubles, they got the hell out of the hot kitchen and granted Rwanda independence. The Tutsi monarchy was dissolved and the two groups fought to fill the power vacuum. The Hutus gained majority while the Tutsis became a refugee diaspora (or scattering of people from an ancestral homeland). Fighting and rioting flared on and off in the following decades and the Tutsis became the scapegoats in every crisis.

What is the Rwandan Patriotic Front? (RPF) In camps surrounding Rwanda, the Tutsi diaspora became increasingly organised (and cross), forming the RPF in 1985. A formidable military force, the RPF (supported by some moderate Hutus) invaded Rwanda in 1990, demanding a return as citizens and an end to discrimination. Meantime, the Hutu President, Juvenal Habyarimana was facing economic crisis and wavering popularity among the Hutus. He used the RPF threat as a means to bring dissident Hutus back to his side.

Campaign of Hate  Habyarimana generated a campaign of fear and hate, based on the assertion that the Tutsi rebels intended to enslave the Hutus and must be resisted at all costs. Media outlets were mobilised and anti-Tutsi propaganda circulated. Hutu groups rallied together to face the RPF, tensions and violence escalated. The Government openly discussed plans to rid the nation of all Tutsis, arms were acquired (reportedly from UK company Mil-Tec Corporation) and high ranking officials trained militia in preparation for ethnic cleansing.

Habyarimana Dies In April 1994, President Habyarimana was killed when his plane was shot down by unknown perpetrators. In (Rwandan capital) Kigali, the presidential guard immediately prepared for revenge. Opposition leaders were killed, the slaughter of Tutsis and moderate, pro-peace Hutus began.

Genocide Within hours, militia were deployed throughout the country to carry out the wave of killings. Before long, unofficial militant groups and Hutu citizens joined the violent campaign, encouraged by the Government and their anti-Tutsi radio propaganda. Money or food was offered as incentives for murder. In some cases, Hutus were told they could appropriate the land of the Tutsis they killed and in other cases, Hutus were forced to kill their Tutsi friends.

Oh, so heartbreaking

International Response A few weeks into the violence, the UN attempted to negotiate a ceasefire on numerous occasions without success, and after the death of 10 UN soldiers, they withdrew altogether, leaving the conflict to play out without them. They have since been widely criticised for their pallid response.

So Who Won? The RPF (Tutsis), under the thirty-something Paul Kagame as leader, renewed their invasion and by July had captured Kigali and declared a ceasefire as the Government collapsed. Around 2 million Hutus fled to Zaire (now Democratic Republic of Congo) and thousands died as disease swept through the camps.

Aftermath What was left behind was, in short, a complete disaster zone, a wasteland. I can hardly bear the details but here they are (in estimates): 250,000 women widowed, 100,000 children separated from their families, 300,000 children killed. 300 children, some less than 10 years old, had been accused of murder. Most surviving children thought they had no future. In Kigali the population had fallen from 300,000 to 50,000 and half of these were displaced. Food and water were scarce. Schools and hospitals were destroyed and basic drug and health supplies had been looted. The new government ministries had no staff, no offices, no equipment, no vehicles and no money in the coffers. Outside the capital, whole families were dead, livestock killed and crops left to decay. Everywhere lay the rotting corpses of the killed.

What Happened Next? On 19th July, a multi ethnic Government was formed. Pasteur Bizimungu, a Hutu, was made President while RPF members were assigned to most cabinet positions. Paul Kagame, the RPF leader, was granted vice-presidency. UN troops and aid workers arrived in Rwanda to help restore basic services.

All refugees were promised a safe return to Rwanda. As they began their return in 1996 and killers, victims and survivors are living uncomfortably side-by-side, the long-awaited genocide trials began, with UN assistance, to bring the countless murderers to justice. Paul Kagame was elected as President in 2003 in the new process of parliamentary election. Another element of the aftermath includes the birth of between 2000 and 5000 babies as a result of “war rape”.

So what happened to the people who committed atrocities? Around 120,000 suspects were rounded up and put in overcrowded prisons, some held there, without trial, for years. 22 people were publicly executed for murder, until the abolishment of the death penalty in 2007. In 2003, prisoners who were very young, old, sick or fully confessed to their crimes were released. They spent three months in education camps (to learn the tragic course of history, the need for national unity and the physical, practical expectations of one who had committed murder) before returning home. For those who truly repented – and they were many among those who were sorry for the misfortune it had brought upon themselves – those who were truly sorry, knew that they needed to say sorry to the survivors left behind. As one killer said (from the Rwandan Stories website), ““I don’t know if my repentance will be accepted, if I will be spared. But regret is like death: you must bring it back home to your hill.” (Nb – Rwanda is known as “the land of a thousand hills”).

Recovery by gacaca Here, I quote the pages of the beautifully written Rwandan Stories:

“In 1998 the government started looking at the possibility of re-introducing Rwanda’s traditional community justice process called gacaca. The word refers to the small grassy area where villagers would traditionally get together to solve disputes. It was a controversial idea. Was it wise to hand over the responsibility to the community? What would the rest of the world think? Would it emphasise punishment or reconciliation? President Kagame, who was Vice President at the time, said, “I wan’t convinced that gacaca was the best approach. I still don’t think gacaca gives us all we need… but it gives us most things… I wanted something stronger than gacaca. The survivors were calling for strong justice. After all, they had been through genocide. Was gacaca going to be enough for them? …eventually I was persuaded that gacaca would help us deal with the massive number of genocide suspects who were in prison.”  ”

After two years of training, development and public education, the gacaca process was put into action and later evolved into a full blown court system using methods of transitional justice designed to promote healing and progression. The system classified crimes and assigned appropriate punishment. Citizen judges were appointed from within communities. It was completed in 2010 and while it has obvious shortcomings, and attracted widespread criticism, the process has had much success while adhering to a simple philosophy:

“Rather than rebuilding a society which had already broken apart – even before the genocide – the new government was determined to build something new. One people, one country, open to all Rwandans regardless of ethnic identity. These were values which had never been experienced by any Rwandans in living memory, but built on shared ideas about the past.” – Rwandan Stories

Paul Kagame

Why is Paul Kagame being criticised? Well it seems there are plenty of people hollering about President Kagame being a dictator of the dick-tator kind. Why? Because allegedly:

  • His Government and army has seen to executions outside the course of justice , as well as incidents of deaths in custody, torture and random arrests based on insufficient evidence
  • He censors the media beyond belief and deals ruthlessly with anyone who shows signs of dissent. Journalists are placed under surveillance, threatened, harassed and/or arrested.
  • He is exceptionally media savvy and has manipulated the public to believe he is a caring and wise leader who has revived the country post tragedy
  • He ensures there is no freedom of religion in Rwanda
  • Along with the Ugandan government, he invaded the north and east of the Democratic Republic of Congo, killing thousands of civilians. He declared war against anti-Tutsi policies and claimed he was fighting for historical Rwandan territories when actually he was honing in on Congolese mineral resources.
  • He suppresses, under threat of arrest, opposition members and parties.
Further conflicting reports of the new, shiny, happy Rwanda can be found here.
Paul Kagame himself insists that most of these allegations are a part of Hutu-extremist propaganda.
The protests planned for CHOGM are to be carried out by members of Australia’s Rwandan Community who are supported by the Rwandan National Congress, the country’s strongest opposition political organisation.

What is Rwanda like today?

“What these people have achieved in the short time since the genocide is unbelievable… this is a terrific country.” Paul Schonherr, Ambassador of the Netherlands.

They can dance again

Rwanda Tourism’s current catchphrase is, “Discover a New African Dawn”. It is growing as a travel destination and tourism is now an important and fast growing economic contributor. Kigali has city tours, Gorilla Trekking in the mountains is a ‘must do’, traditional music and dance is celebrated and demonstrated, basketry and ceramics are displayed.

The economy is mainly dependent on subsistence farming and has recovered since the genocide, with Gross Domestic Product near on quadrupling since 1994.

The population is young – 97.5% are under 65.

Today’s Rwandan news includes reports of HIV rates falling, the upcoming Rwandan Film Festival, athletes in training for London 2012, carbon markets and clean energy ramp-ups, additional Governmental staff and the birth of rare gorilla twins.

April the 7th is Genocide Memorial Day and every year marks the beginning of an official National Week of Mourning.

A Thought for the Twa The original inhabitants of Rwanda are the Twa, or Batwa. They are descendent of the ‘pygmy’ people of Central Africa. They consider themselves the forgotten people of Africa. In Rwanda there are an estimated 33,000 Twa, none of whom own land. They work mostly as potters or porters, but their services and goods are required less and less. They are “displaced” and often live in grass huts. Up to 10,000 Batwa died in the genocide while another 8 to 10,000 fled. Their number are still said to be depleting.

Batwa Children

Look Back On…THE VIETNAM WAR

I don’t mean to be so war oriented, it’s just that a few things have happened this week that make these particular wars relevant.

Today is Vietnam Veteran’s Day and the 45th anniversary of the Battle of Long Tan and until today I had heard of it but couldn’t say exactly what it was, which seems a terrible insult to the people involved, who must carry stuff like this with them like a sack ‘o spuds, not to mention the people who were rewarded and acclaimed for their bravery in this David and Goliath battle. Here’s what happened – in a South Vietnamese  rubber plantation, near the village of Long Tan, 108 ANZACS repelled a large convoy (up to 2000 ) of Vietcong. They were outnumbered 25 to 1, 18 Australians were killed and 24 wounded, while at least 245 Vietcong were killed. It was a clear Australian victory. While I can’t rejoice in the death of anyone, I can respect the fact that the battle is cited as an example of good military co-ordination and I agree that the Vietnam Vets involved should have their gallantry honoured, as it has been done  (belatedly) today by Govenor General Quentin Bryce.

But that all begged the question, to which I had only vague answers – why were the Aussie’s there in the first place and why was there a war at all? Rightio, as concise as I can…

When? The Vietnam War had its roots back in the forties when it was a French colony, but it started officially in 1959 and ended in 1975.

What? It was a conflict based on a successful attempt to reunify North and South Vietnam under communist rule. Essentially the French and the US were shitting themselves about the spread of communism and so intervened to assist the South Vietnamese army resist takeover by big old commie Ho Chi Minh and his rebel mates.

Who? On the communist side were the people of the Democratic Republic of North Vietnam and the South Vietnamese National Front for the Liberation of South Vietnam (labelled the Viet Cong by the US to discredit them – and maybe because it’s less of a mouthful to holler in the jungle?). These communist groups were assisted by China and the Soviet Union. On the other side was the Republic of Vietnam, the Us and its allies (Australia included).

Why? Well in 1954, French forces surrendered their colony at the hand of the Viet Minh(a liberation movement formed by Prime MInister Ho Chi Minh in 1941 to seek independence from France). This lead to a (supposedly temporary) division of Vietnam into North and South. The North was made a socialist state by the Viet Minh. In the South, with military and financial assistance from the US, a non-communist state was formed, headed by Prime Minister Ngo Dinh Diem. In 1955, Diem claimed that the North was plotting to take the South by force and launched a campaign to denounce the communists. Thousands of communists and those suspected were imprisoned, tortured or executed. Finally in 1959, the northern communist party, under pressure from the embattled southern communists, authorised an armed struggle to mobilise Diem opposition and reunify Vietnam. The National Liberation Front (NLF) was born.  Infiltration of men and weapons began from the north along the Ho Chi Minh trail. Frightened by the threat of communism (during the Cold War), US President Kennedy sent in troops to aid and train the Army of the Republic of Vietnam (ARVN).

What Happened Next?  Ok I’m cutting a long story short here so please don’t think I’m trivialising things…Bombing of North Vietnam, search-and-destroy missions, Guerilla warfare (used widely by the NLF), Americanisation of South Vietnam, corruption, US anti-war demonstrations, allied forces called up (conscripted Aussie troops departed for Vietnam in 1965), more fighting, massacre at the hands of US GI (including the infamous Mai Lai tragedy in which up to 504 unarmed Vietnamese civilians wre tortured, raped and killed at the hands of arsehole US soldiers) which lead to further and louder protest and a huge anti-war movement…

The Mai Lai Massacre - Heartbreaking :-(

How did this Shamozzle End?  In the US and Australia, the anti-war movement gathered such momentum that politically it was ridiculous for potential leaders to support the war. The US under Nixon altered tactics to withdraw whilst intensifying bombing on Communist sanctuaries in Cambodia and stepping up training of ARVN. In 1973, a peace agreement was signed by all parties which provided for US withdrawal. The fighting between South Vietnam and the communists continued until finally the north launched an offensive in 1975 and ARVN resistance collapsed and Saigon fell at the hands of the NLF. Vietnam was reunified in 1976 and Saigon was renamed Ho-Chi Minh City.

What Was The Wash Up? Casualties of war (estimated): US troops – 57,690; ARVN – 240,000; NFL – 666,000; North Vietnamese civilians – 65,000; South Vietnamese civilians – 300,000; Aus & NZ troops – 659.

And Vietnam Today? Well Vietnam still has a communist Government, but a market controlled (capitalist) economy, similar to China. At this time, China and Vietnam are said to be the fastest growing economies in the world.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 114 other followers